ArticleNeurology2025
Health Care Delivery and Financial Considerations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinics: A Survey of Clinic Directors.
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesClinical care for people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PLWALS) is directed at slowing disease progression and symptom management. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a multidisciplinary approach to providing ALS health care because observational studies show that multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) extend survival and improve quality of life. However, providing multidisciplinary care is a challenging financial proposition. To understand how MDCs are financed, we surveyed ALS MDCs across the Northeast ALS Consortium network in the United States.
methodsWe surveyed clinic directors in the Northeast ALS Consortium, a group of institutions equipped to provide ALS care and perform research and clinical trials in ALS. Respondents (n = 61; response rate = 49.6%) provided information regarding their care model, services, funding sources, and financial solvency between December 2020 and August 2021.
resultsIn 74% (n = 45) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the entire multidisciplinary team, and in 26% (n = 16) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the physician and triaged according to needs. In 79% (n = 48) of clinics, visit duration was ≥3 hours, and on average, 8.4 services were available, compared with 6.8 in clinics lasting <3 hours. Most of the MDCs offer occupational (97%; n = 59), speech (97%; n = 59), and physical (95%; n = 58) therapies on site. The most common source of financial support was third-party nonprofits/philanthropy (92%; n = 56). Fifty-nine percent (n = 36) of clinics received financial support from their parent organizations (e.g., universities). Only 17% (n = 10) of clinics reported no deficit, and all clinics used multiple income sources. DISCUSSION: These findings reconfirm the range of services available to PLWALS and highlight the financial challenges facing ALS MDCs. The main limitation is that recruitment was through the NEALS network which primarily includes MDCs, so we were not able to compare with non-MDCs. Since not all centers responded, there may be other differences in the characteristics of the centers that did respond and those that did not leading to some bias. Future work should support the goal of reducing reliance on funding from nonprofits and increase reimbursement from payers, so health care providers can provide high-quality ALS care and cover costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.