Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883905›Full record

ArticleNeurology2025

Health Care Delivery and Financial Considerations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinics: A Survey of Clinic Directors.

Ilene L Hollin, Gema Giler, Terry D Heiman-Patterson, Northeast ALS Consortium Clinical Studies Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilene L HollinFrom the Temple University College of Public Health (I.L.H.); Thomas Jefferson University (G.G.); and Department of Neurology (T.D.H.-P.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Gema GilerFrom the Temple University College of Public Health (I.L.H.); Thomas Jefferson University (G.G.); and Department of Neurology (T.D.H.-P.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Terry D Heiman-PattersonFrom the Temple University College of Public Health (I.L.H.); Thomas Jefferson University (G.G.); and Department of Neurology (T.D.H.-P.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-1041
Northeast ALS Consortium Clinical Studies GroupFrom the Temple University College of Public Health (I.L.H.); Thomas Jefferson University (G.G.); and Department of Neurology (T.D.H.-P.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesClinical care for people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PLWALS) is directed at slowing disease progression and symptom management. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a multidisciplinary approach to providing ALS health care because observational studies show that multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) extend survival and improve quality of life. However, providing multidisciplinary care is a challenging financial proposition. To understand how MDCs are financed, we surveyed ALS MDCs across the Northeast ALS Consortium network in the United States.

methodsWe surveyed clinic directors in the Northeast ALS Consortium, a group of institutions equipped to provide ALS care and perform research and clinical trials in ALS. Respondents (n = 61; response rate = 49.6%) provided information regarding their care model, services, funding sources, and financial solvency between December 2020 and August 2021.

resultsIn 74% (n = 45) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the entire multidisciplinary team, and in 26% (n = 16) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the physician and triaged according to needs. In 79% (n = 48) of clinics, visit duration was ≥3 hours, and on average, 8.4 services were available, compared with 6.8 in clinics lasting <3 hours. Most of the MDCs offer occupational (97%; n = 59), speech (97%; n = 59), and physical (95%; n = 58) therapies on site. The most common source of financial support was third-party nonprofits/philanthropy (92%; n = 56). Fifty-nine percent (n = 36) of clinics received financial support from their parent organizations (e.g., universities). Only 17% (n = 10) of clinics reported no deficit, and all clinics used multiple income sources. DISCUSSION: These findings reconfirm the range of services available to PLWALS and highlight the financial challenges facing ALS MDCs. The main limitation is that recruitment was through the NEALS network which primarily includes MDCs, so we were not able to compare with non-MDCs. Since not all centers responded, there may be other differences in the characteristics of the centers that did respond and those that did not leading to some bias. Future work should support the goal of reducing reliance on funding from nonprofits and increase reimbursement from payers, so health care providers can provide high-quality ALS care and cover costs.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDelivery of Health CareHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39883905
PMCPMC11781782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.