ArticleJournal of global health2025
Analysis of the characteristics and illness comprehension bias among Chinese patients with psycho-cardiovascular disease: a multi-centre cross-sectional survey.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety, impacts cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis and management. Illness comprehension is essential for effective treatment, but biases can lead to suboptimal outcomes. We explored psycho-cardiovascular disease (PCD) patient characteristics, with a specific focus on comprehension biases and treatment choices from patients' perspectives in China, to improve management strategies. Methods: We enrolled 864 PCD patients in Chinese hospitals across 11 provinces. Tools included the seven-item General Anxiety Disorder scale, the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and a self-designed PCD illness comprehensibility survey. We used χ Results: Of 834 enrolled PCD patients, over 90% experienced mild to moderate anxiety and depression, yet less than 10% received treatment. 52.90% of patients had high illness comprehension. Among the high comprehension group, there were fewer labourers (19.30% vs. 26.40%; P < 0.05), fewer older individuals (39.20% vs. 46.90%; P < 0.05), and those with lower household income (15.60% vs. 30.50%; P < 0.05). A greater proportion of those in the high comprehension group lacked insurance (17.50% vs. 10.00%; P < 0.05), and they were more highly educated (42.90% vs. 32.10% with a college education). Additionally, more patients in the high comprehension group frequently received psychological consultation (24.00% vs. 5.10%; P < 0.05) and therapy (7.70% vs. 2.30%; P < 0.05). These patient groups preferred tertiary hospitals (71.66% vs. 63.33%; P < 0.05) and psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%; P < 0.05). In comparison, low comprehension patients prioritised cost (32.65% vs. 46.41%; P < 0.05) and favoured a transition to community hospitals (16.55% vs. 25.38%; P < 0.05). Conclusions: More than 90% of PCD patients in Chinese CVD departments experience mild to moderate anxiety and depression with low treatment rates. Different illness comprehension levels are associated with variations in treatment willingness, considerations, health care preferences, medication choices, and illness knowledge acquisition methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.