ArticlePloS one2025
Possible influence of sex on the relationship between dual-task gait costs and cognitive decline in older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of cognitive decline in older adults can be evaluated with dual-task gait (DTG) testing in which a cognitive task is performed during walking, leading to increased costs of gait. Previous research demonstrated that higher DTG costs correlate with increasing cognitive deficits and with age. The present study was conducted to explore whether the relationship between the DTG costs and cognitive abilities in older individuals is influenced by sex differences. To address this objective, we conducted a study with 216 elderly participants (age range: 60 to 75 years, 127 females). These underwent Cognitive Functional Dementia (CFD) testing to determine their cognitive abilities and DTG testing to evaluate their gait parameters (gait speed, cadence, stride length, stride variance, and stance phase duration) while performing a backward serial number counting task. We carried out a correlation analysis between the CFD scores and the DTG costs. The DTG costs were calculated as the percentage difference between the gait parameters in single- and in dual-task testing, and the effects were compared considering the factors of sex and age. A significant negative correlation between the CFD scores and the dual-task costs of gait parameters was found only in males. The DTG costs did not differ between the sexes, while women obtained superior scores in the CFD test. The higher DTG costs significantly correlated with older age in men. In summary, our study provides evidence that, unlike in women, the DTG costs during the backward serial number counting task significantly increase in older men, correlating with declines in cognitive performance and increasing age. These findings suggest that the assessment of DT gait characteristics in relation to cognitive decline in older adults may manifest differently between sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.