Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883642›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians.

Danielle Ireland, Christina Rabeler, Sagar Rao, Rudy J Richardson, Eva-Maria S Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle IrelandDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9827-1604
Christina RabelerDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Sagar RaoDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Rudy J RichardsonDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-7042

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental illnesses put a tremendous burden on afflicted individuals and society. Identification of novel drugs to treat such conditions is intrinsically challenging due to the complexity of neuropsychiatric diseases and the need for a systems-level understanding that goes beyond single molecule-target interactions. Thus far, drug discovery approaches focused on target-based in silico or in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) have had limited success because they cannot capture pathway interactions or predict how a compound will affect the whole organism. Organismal behavioral testing is needed to fill the gap, but mammalian studies are too time-consuming and cost-prohibitive for the early stages of drug discovery. Behavioral medium-throughput screening (MTS) in small organisms promises to address this need and complement in silico and in vitro HTS to improve the discovery of novel neuroactive compounds. Here, we used cheminformatics and MTS in the freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica-an invertebrate system used for neurotoxicant testing-to evaluate the extent to which complementary insight could be gained from the two data streams. In this pilot study, our goal was to classify 19 neuroactive compounds into their functional categories: antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants. Drug classification was performed with the same computational methods, using either physicochemical descriptors or planarian behavioral profiling. As it was not obvious a priori which classification method was most suited to this task, we compared the performance of four classification approaches. We used principal coordinate analysis or uniform manifold approximation and projection, each coupled with linear discriminant analysis, and two types of machine learning models-artificial neural net ensembles and support vector machines. Classification based on physicochemical properties had comparable accuracy to classification based on planarian profiling, especially with the machine learning models that all had accuracies of 90-100%. Planarian behavioral MTS correctly identified drugs with multiple therapeutic uses, thus yielding additional information compared to cheminformatics. Given that planarian behavioral MTS is an inexpensive true 3R (refine, reduce, replace) alternative to vertebrate testing and requires zero a priori knowledge about a chemical, it is a promising experimental system to complement in silico cheminformatics to identify new drug candidates.

Indexed as

PlanariansAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCheminformaticsDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID39883642
PMCPMC11781733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.