Trial reportPloS one2025
Multi-session tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex and associative memory.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017-2025: An update) - endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN).Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Associative memory (AM) plays a crucial role in our ability to link disparate elements of our experiences, yet it is especially vulnerable to age-related decline and pathological conditions. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been investigated as a potential intervention to enhance cognitive functions, including AM. Previous tDCS studies yielded inconsistent results, often due to variations in stimulation sites and protocols. Nonetheless, enough evidence suggests that tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) can improve AM performance. This study aimed to investigate the cumulative effects of multiple anodal tDCS over the PPC on AM performance alongside item memory and verbal fluency. In a randomized sham-controlled trial, 59 healthy young adults were assigned to either anodal or sham stimulation group, receiving tDCS (1.5 mA, for 20 minutes, at P3) over three consecutive days. Memory performance was assessed at four timepoints: pretest, immediately after the first session, posttest (Day 5), and follow-up (Day 9). Although tDCS was well tolerated, the anticipated enhancement of memory performance was not observed. We interpret these findings in the light of methodological considerations and propose potential explanations for the observed results emphasizing the large between-participants variability in memory performance as a significant factor that may have hindered the detection of tDCS effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.