Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883628›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Multi-session tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex and associative memory.

Luka Juras, Marina Martinčević, Uroš Konstantinović, Saša R Filipović, Andrea Vranić, Jovana Bjekić

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luka JurasDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5170-1793
Marina MartinčevićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Uroš KonstantinovićHuman Neuroscience Group and Centre for Neuroscience and Neuromodulation, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Saša R FilipovićHuman Neuroscience Group and Centre for Neuroscience and Neuromodulation, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-3367
Andrea VranićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-8014
Jovana BjekićHuman Neuroscience Group and Centre for Neuroscience and Neuromodulation, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-0324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associative memory (AM) plays a crucial role in our ability to link disparate elements of our experiences, yet it is especially vulnerable to age-related decline and pathological conditions. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been investigated as a potential intervention to enhance cognitive functions, including AM. Previous tDCS studies yielded inconsistent results, often due to variations in stimulation sites and protocols. Nonetheless, enough evidence suggests that tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) can improve AM performance. This study aimed to investigate the cumulative effects of multiple anodal tDCS over the PPC on AM performance alongside item memory and verbal fluency. In a randomized sham-controlled trial, 59 healthy young adults were assigned to either anodal or sham stimulation group, receiving tDCS (1.5 mA, for 20 minutes, at P3) over three consecutive days. Memory performance was assessed at four timepoints: pretest, immediately after the first session, posttest (Day 5), and follow-up (Day 9). Although tDCS was well tolerated, the anticipated enhancement of memory performance was not observed. We interpret these findings in the light of methodological considerations and propose potential explanations for the observed results emphasizing the large between-participants variability in memory performance as a significant factor that may have hindered the detection of tDCS effects.

Indexed as

MemoryParietal LobeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39883628
PMCPMC11781686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.