Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883592›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2025

Immune-related adverse events in older adults receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a comprehensive analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Buğra Han Esen, Sevval Nur Bektas, Umur Topcu, Bahadır Köylü, Fadime Buket Bayram Kuvvet, Gulistan Bahat, Fatih Selçukbiricik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Improving assessment of financial toxicity of cancer immunotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Buğra Han EsenSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7430-1381
Sevval Nur BektasSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6953-3804
Umur TopcuSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-3794
Bahadır KöylüDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University Hospital, Davutpaşa Street 34010 Topkapı, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4462-6393
Fadime Buket Bayram KuvvetDepartment of Internal Medicine, Koç University Hospital, Davutpaşa Street 34010 Topkapı, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0248-9191
Gulistan BahatDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5343-9795
Fatih SelçukbiricikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University Hospital, Davutpaşa Street 34010 Topkapı, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer therapy, yet they carry a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Given the ageing global population and the underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials for ICIs, we investigated the occurrence and characteristics of irAEs in older versus younger adults as well as among different age subsets within the older adult population.

methodsWe analysed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database reports from 2015 to 2023, focusing on ICIs. We categorised irAEs into 11 distinct types and performed descriptive and multivariate analyses to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of irAEs across different age groups, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

resultsAmong 47 513 patients aged 18-100 reporting irAEs, the 65-74 and 75-84 age groups had significantly increased risks compared to 18-64 (OR 1.13, 95% CI [1.09-1.18]; 1.15 [1.1-1.21]). Cardiovascular irAEs rose with age, peaking at 75-84, while endocrine irAEs decreased. Hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal and ocular irAEs decreased with age, but renal and musculoskeletal irAEs increased, showing higher risks in older adults. Serious outcomes slightly decreased in the 85+ group, while the proportion of deaths increased with age.

conclusionWe discuss the potential changes in the immune system contributing to the decreased prevalence of irAEs in the oldest age group. Additionally, conservative treatment approaches and underreporting of irAEs in older patients may influence these findings. Our findings highlight the need for personalised decision-making for ICI therapies, considering performance status and comorbidities rather than age alone.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadverse eventFood and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)immune checkpoint inhibitorsolder adultsolder peoplepharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID39883592
PMCPMC11781319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.