ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Information-blocking trends following regulatory action.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The digital divide among U.S. Hospitals delivering health services to populations with high social disparities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the prevalence of and trends in practices that interfere with the exchange of patient health information (potential information blocking) 2 years after implementation of information-blocking regulations. MATERIALS AND
methodsDrawing from the American Hospital Association Information Technology (IT) Supplement and a national survey of health information organizations (HIOs), we described rates and methods of potential information blocking from these organizations' perspectives in 2023 and compared them to prior years.
resultsTwenty-seven percent of hospitals sometimes or often observed potential information blocking by any actor in 2023, down from 42% in 2021 and 33% in 2022. Thirty percent of HIOs routinely observed potential information blocking by health IT developers, down from 50% in 2015. 13% of HIOs routinely observed potential information blocking by hospitals and health systems, down from 25% in 2015. According to both hospitals and HIOs, the most prevalent method of potential information blocking by developers in 2023 was through price, while the most prevalent by healthcare providers/health systems was by focusing exchange on strategic affiliations. Few hospitals and HIOs that experienced potential information blocking said that they had reported it to the Department of Health and Human Services. DISCUSSION: Hospitals and HIOs perceived lower rates of potential information blocking in 2023 than in prior years indicating some impact of regulations addressing information blocking. However, both respondent types reported that substantial potential information blocking persisted in 2023 and negatively impacted the exchange of information.
conclusionWhile potential information-blocking practices have decreased, they have not been eliminated, indicating the value of continued and robust enforcement of information-blocking regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.