ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Attention-aware differential learning for predicting peptide-MHC class I binding and T cell receptor recognition.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- Computational prediction of TCR cross-reactivity: principles, challenges and translational opportunities.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of neoantigens is crucial for advancing vaccines, diagnostics, and immunotherapies. Despite this importance, a fundamental question remains: how to model the presentation of neoantigens by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules and the recognition of the peptide-MHC-I (pMHC-I) complex by T cell receptors (TCRs). Accurate prediction of pMHC-I binding and TCR recognition remains a significant computational challenge in immunology due to intricate binding motifs and the long-tail distribution of known binding pairs in public databases. Here, we propose an attention-aware framework comprising TranspMHC for pMHC-I binding prediction and TransTCR for TCR-pMHC-I recognition prediction. Leveraging the attention mechanism, TranspMHC surpasses existing algorithms on independent datasets at both pan-specific and allele-specific levels. For TCR-pMHC-I recognition, TransTCR incorporates transfer learning and a differential learning strategy, demonstrating superior performance and enhanced generalization on independent datasets compared to existing methods. Furthermore, we identify key amino acids associated with binding motifs of peptides and TCRs that facilitate pMHC-I and TCR-pMHC-I binding, indicating the potential interpretability of our proposed framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.