Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883469›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2025

Urinary DNA Methylation Test for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.

In Gab Jeong, Sung-Cheol Yun, Hong Koo Ha, Sung Gu Kang, Sangchul Lee, Sungchan Park, Hyun Hwan Sung, Sun Il Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Kyung Cheol Moon and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Diagnostic potential of urinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Translational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. UrinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

In Gab JeongDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Cheol YunDivision of Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Koo HaDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Sung Gu KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangchul LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sungchan ParkDepartment of Urology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Hwan SungDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Il KimDepartment of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Eu Chang HwangDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Cheol MoonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: An accurate noninvasive biomarker test is needed for the early diagnosis of bladder cancer. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a urinary DNA methylation test (PENK methylation) and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test or urine cytology test. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective multicenter study at 10 sites in the Republic of Korea, individuals 40 years and older with hematuria undergoing cystoscopy within 3 months between March 11, 2022, and May 30, 2024, participated. The study participants were evaluated for bladder cancer using a urinary DNA methylation test. Exposure: Urinary DNA methylation test, NMP22 test, and urine cytology test. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of the urinary DNA methylation test for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer. Secondary objectives included the accuracy of the test for overall bladder cancer (all stages and grades) and the comparison of sensitivities and specificities for bladder cancer between the urinary DNA methylation test and the NMP22 test or urine cytology test. Results: Among the 1099 participants, 614 (55.9%) were male; participants had a mean (SD) age of 65 (10) years. Of the 1099 participants, 219 and 176 participants had bladder cancer and high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, respectively. The urinary DNA methylation test had sensitivity and specificity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer of 89.2% (95% CI, 84.6%-93.8%) and 87.8% (95% CI, 85.6%-89.9%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for overall bladder cancer were 78.1% (95% CI, 72.6%-83.6%) and 88.8% (95% CI, 86.7%-90.8%), respectively. The positive predictive value for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer was 61.3% (95% CI, 55.4%-67.3%), and the negative predictive value was 97.6% (95% CI, 96.6%-98.7%). In comparison with the NMP22 test or urine cytology test, the urinary DNA methylation test showed significantly superior sensitivity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer and overall bladder cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective multicenter study of individuals with hematuria, the urinary DNA methylation test showed 89% sensitivity for detecting high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, outperforming the NMP22 test or urine cytology test with high specificity. While this test had an excellent negative predictive value, its positive predictive value was suboptimal.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNuclear ProteinsProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, Tumornuclear matrix protein 22Nuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39883469
PMCPMC11783243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.