ArticleJAMA oncology2025
Urinary DNA Methylation Test for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical complete response as a surrogate for pathological response in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Urinary protein semi-quantification in immunochemotherapy for bladder cancer: markers of clinical outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Diagnostic potential of urinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- DNA methylation biomarkers associated with early gastric cardia carcinogenesis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancing bladder cancer detection: commentary on a urinary DNA methylation diagnostic assay.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- UrinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of postoperative recurrence in bladder cancer using clinical and laboratory indicators.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EarlyTect BCD Plus: A urine-based dual site PENK methylation test for risk-based cystoscopy triage in haematuria.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Multidimensional liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: advances in circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, exosomes, and metabolomics.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for urothelial cells classification and risk scoring in urine cytology.iScience · 2026Article
- Decoding the role of exosomes in bladder cancer: focusing on tumor progression and immune microenvironment modulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Recent Advances in Early Detection, Treatment Prediction, and Prognosis.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Urinary biomarkers in multicentric studies: Shaping the future of bladder cancer diagnosis and follow-up.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers.Genes & genomics · 2025Review
- Potential of Urinary Mutation and Methylation Biomarkers in Selecting Candidates for Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of urinary PENK methylation test for urothelial and other cancers: A prospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byUrinary2026
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: An accurate noninvasive biomarker test is needed for the early diagnosis of bladder cancer. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a urinary DNA methylation test (PENK methylation) and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test or urine cytology test. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective multicenter study at 10 sites in the Republic of Korea, individuals 40 years and older with hematuria undergoing cystoscopy within 3 months between March 11, 2022, and May 30, 2024, participated. The study participants were evaluated for bladder cancer using a urinary DNA methylation test. Exposure: Urinary DNA methylation test, NMP22 test, and urine cytology test. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of the urinary DNA methylation test for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer. Secondary objectives included the accuracy of the test for overall bladder cancer (all stages and grades) and the comparison of sensitivities and specificities for bladder cancer between the urinary DNA methylation test and the NMP22 test or urine cytology test. Results: Among the 1099 participants, 614 (55.9%) were male; participants had a mean (SD) age of 65 (10) years. Of the 1099 participants, 219 and 176 participants had bladder cancer and high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, respectively. The urinary DNA methylation test had sensitivity and specificity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer of 89.2% (95% CI, 84.6%-93.8%) and 87.8% (95% CI, 85.6%-89.9%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for overall bladder cancer were 78.1% (95% CI, 72.6%-83.6%) and 88.8% (95% CI, 86.7%-90.8%), respectively. The positive predictive value for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer was 61.3% (95% CI, 55.4%-67.3%), and the negative predictive value was 97.6% (95% CI, 96.6%-98.7%). In comparison with the NMP22 test or urine cytology test, the urinary DNA methylation test showed significantly superior sensitivity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer and overall bladder cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective multicenter study of individuals with hematuria, the urinary DNA methylation test showed 89% sensitivity for detecting high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, outperforming the NMP22 test or urine cytology test with high specificity. While this test had an excellent negative predictive value, its positive predictive value was suboptimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.