ArticleJAMA network open2025
Transportation Insecurity, Social Support, and Adherence to Cancer Screening.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multilevel factors influencing colorectal cancer screening adherence: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Adherence to Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in Spain: Evidence from the 2023 Spanish Health Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Emerging Perspectives on Adverse Childhood Experiences and Brain Cancer Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Improving Research on Transportation Interventions in Health Care.Health services research · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Health-Related Social Needs in a National Sample of US Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Transportation insecurity, loneliness, and emotional support among individuals with a history of cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Breast assessment using next generation handheld ultrasound device based on silicon chips: a pilot study in senology.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Perceived community cervical cancer prevention support and cervical cancer screening utilization among women in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Transportation-related factors, cancer screening, and stage at diagnosis: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Further assessment of structural and social determinant of health effects on breast cancer care timelines: a qualitative study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinical breast examination (CBE) uptake: insights from women in northeastern Peninsular Malaysia.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Beyond screening: neighborhood-level factors associated with colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Factors associated with receipt of surveillance breast MRI among racially and ethnically diverse women with operable breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Child caregiving and cancer screening: a nationally representative analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Associations Between Transportation Barriers in the Context of Other Social Needs and Cancer Screening Adherence.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Stage at Diagnosis for Common Cancers according to Rurality, Area Deprivation, and Insurance, 2017 to 2021.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Mammography Screening Among Women Living With HIV in the United States: A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Health Care Empowerment.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC · 2025Article
- Modeling the impact of social determinants on breast cancer screening: a data-driven approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Collaborative Approach to Improving Breast Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Through Multicomponent Interventions and Process Improvements: The Links to Care Community Grants Project study protocol and baseline findings.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Transportation insecurity and lack of social support are 2 understudied social determinants of health that contribute to excess morbidity, mortality, and acute health care utilization. However, whether and how these social determinants of health are associated with cancer screening has not been determined and has implications for preventive care. Objective: To determine whether transportation insecurity or social support are associated with screening adherence for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the publicly available 2018 in-person National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) comprising a noninstitutionalized, civilian adult population of the United States. Participants included adults eligible for colorectal, breast, or cervical cancer screening who participated in the in-depth NHIS interview (1 selected per household). Data were acquired in December 2023 and analyzed through July 31, 2024. Exposures: Transportation insecurity, represented dichotomously as adults who reported that they have or have not delayed medical care in the past year due to transportation difficulties, and neighborhood social support, represented as factor scores derived from 4 Likert-type questions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was adherence to the US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendations in place during 2018 for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer. Results: In 2018, of 25 417 NHIS respondents (55% female), 660 (3%) reported delaying medical care because they did not have transportation. In fully adjusted models, transportation insecurity was associated with adherence to breast cancer screening (odds ratio [OR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.40-0.86]) but not to colorectal (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.65-1.15]) or cervical (OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.46-1.13) cancer screening. Social support was associated with colorectal (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]) and breast (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]) cancer screening but not with cervical cancer screening (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.93-1.10]). There were no significant interactions between transportation insecurity and social support for any cancer screening. Conclusions and Relevance: The presence of transportation insecurity was associated with a 41% reduction in the odds of breast cancer screening. Clinicians should consider screening for transportation needs at the time of mammography referral, as patients may be eligible for programs that can assist with medical transportation needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.