ArticleJAMA2025
Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03498716 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Atezolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Atezolizumab (Anti PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination With Adjuvant Anthracycline/Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Operable Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Predictor of Adjuvant Avelumab Efficacy in Patients with High-risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Effect of adjuvant carboplatin intensified chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy on survival in women with high risk, early stage, triple negative breast cancer (CITRINE): randomised, open label phase 3 trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Trial
- FOXC1 Expression Predicts Capecitabine Efficacy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer from the GEICAM_CIBOMA Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- The peripheral immune landscape of human breast cancer.Oncoimmunology · 2026Review
- The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Breast cancer immunogenicity as a spectrum: evolving concepts and therapeutic implications.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Performance of large language models in ambiguous treatment scenarios of early breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Surgery-first versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage I (cT1c) triple-negative breast cancer: A critical reappraisal.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant therapy for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence, clinical boundaries and emerging strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Insights on postneoadjuvant treatment among patients with triple-negative breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy: can expert consensus help to interpret the current evidence?British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated uveitis in a patient with breast cancer and a remote history of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: a case report.International cancer conference journal · 2026Article
- Beyond Molecular Classification in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Toward Subtype-Guided Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Observational
- Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes according to PD-L1 status in >2000 patients with early-stage or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated in the real-world setting: VANESSA study results.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Observational
- Cholesterol efflux protein, ABCA1, supports anticancer functions of myeloid immune cells.Science advances · 2026Article
- Revisiting the standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: timing, duration, dose, combination, and patient selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The 19th St. Gallen international breast cancer conference 'primary therapy of patients with early breast cancer. Evidence, controversies, consensus': key moments and breakthroughs.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Biomarker prediction of immunotherapy response in breast cancer: from single markers to multi-omics integration.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
- Future perspective of clinical usefulness of metabolic and mitochondrial heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancers.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype with a high incidence in young patients, a high incidence in non-Hispanic Black women, and a high risk of progression to metastatic cancer, a devastating sequela with a 12- to 18-month life expectancy. Until recently, one strategy for treating early-stage triple-negative breast cancer was chemotherapy after surgery. However, it was not known whether the addition of immune therapy to postsurgery chemotherapy would be beneficial. Objective: To evaluate the addition of immune therapy in the form of atezolizumab to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with the high-risk triple-negative breast cancer subtype. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this open-label international randomized phase 3 trial conducted in more than 330 centers in 31 countries, patients undergoing surgery as initial treatment for stage II or III triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled between August 2, 2018, and November 11, 2022. The last patient follow-up was on August 18, 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard chemotherapy for 20 weeks with (n = 1101) or without (n = 1098) the immune therapy drug atezolizumab for up to 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (time between randomization and invasive breast cancer in the same or opposite breast, recurrence elsewhere in the body, or death from any cause). Results: The median age of enrolled patients was 53 years and most self-reported as being of Asian or White race and neither Latino nor Hispanic ethnicity. The study independent data monitoring committee halted enrollment at 2199 of 2300 planned patients. All patients stopped atezolizumab following a planned early interim and futility analysis. The trial continued to a premature final analysis. With invasive disease-free survival events in 141 patients (12.8%) treated with atezolizumab-chemotherapy and 125 (11.4%) with chemotherapy alone (median follow-up, 32 months), the final stratified invasive disease-free survival hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.87-1.42; P = .38). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the regimen of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with more treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (54% vs 44%) but similar incidences of fatal adverse events (0.8% vs 0.6%) and adverse events leading to chemotherapy discontinuation. Chemotherapy exposure was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The addition of the immune therapy drug atezolizumab to chemotherapy after surgery did not provide benefit among patients with triple-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrent disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03498716.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.