Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883436›Full record

ArticleJAMA2025

Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Michail Ignatiadis, Andrew Bailey, Heather McArthur, Sarra El-Abed, Evandro de Azambuja, Otto Metzger, Stephen Y Chui, Max Dieterich, Thomas Perretti, Esther Shearer-Kang and 31 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03498716 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Atezolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03498716 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Atezolizumab (Anti PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination With Adjuvant Anthracycline/Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Operable Triple Negative Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2018 to 2023Enrolled2,199ConditionsTriple Negative Breast CancerArmsAtezolizumab, Paclitaxel, Dose-dense Doxorubicin or dose-dense Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Predictor of Adjuvant Avelumab Efficacy in Patients with High-risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. FOXC1 Expression Predicts Capecitabine Efficacy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer from the GEICAM_CIBOMA Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Michail IgnatiadisInstitut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles and Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Andrew BaileyFrontier Science, Kincraig, United Kingdom.
Heather McArthurSimmons Cancer Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Sarra El-AbedBreast International Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Evandro de AzambujaInstitut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles and Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Otto MetzgerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen Y ChuiGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Max DieterichF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas PerrettiF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Esther Shearer-KangGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Luciana MolineroGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Günther G StegerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jacek JassemMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Soo Chin LeeNational University Hospital Singapore, Singapore.
Michaela HigginsCancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Jose ZarbaNational University of Tucaman, Tucaman, Argentina.
Marcus SchmidtComprehensive Cancer Center University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Henry GomezNational Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru.
Angel Guerrero ZotanoOncology Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Luca MoscettiAzienda University Hospital, Modena, Italy.
Joanne ChiuQueen Mary Hospital & Gleneagles Hospital Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Elisabetta MunzoneEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Noa Efrat Ben-BaruchKaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Emilio BajettaInstituto Nationale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Shinji OhnoCancer Institute of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Seock-Ah ImSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gustavo WerutskyHospital São Lucas PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Einav Nili Gal-YamBreast Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Xavier Gonzalez FarreInternational University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Ling-Ming TsengTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
William JacotInstitut Regional du Cancer, Montpellier, France.
Oleg GluzBreast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Zhimin ShaoFudan University Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Yaroslav ShparykLviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Anastasia ZiminaOmsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russian Federation.
Eric WinerYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
David A CameronBreast International Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe VialeEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Shigehira SajiFukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Richard GelberDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martine PiccartInstitut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles and Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype with a high incidence in young patients, a high incidence in non-Hispanic Black women, and a high risk of progression to metastatic cancer, a devastating sequela with a 12- to 18-month life expectancy. Until recently, one strategy for treating early-stage triple-negative breast cancer was chemotherapy after surgery. However, it was not known whether the addition of immune therapy to postsurgery chemotherapy would be beneficial. Objective: To evaluate the addition of immune therapy in the form of atezolizumab to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with the high-risk triple-negative breast cancer subtype. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this open-label international randomized phase 3 trial conducted in more than 330 centers in 31 countries, patients undergoing surgery as initial treatment for stage II or III triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled between August 2, 2018, and November 11, 2022. The last patient follow-up was on August 18, 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard chemotherapy for 20 weeks with (n = 1101) or without (n = 1098) the immune therapy drug atezolizumab for up to 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (time between randomization and invasive breast cancer in the same or opposite breast, recurrence elsewhere in the body, or death from any cause). Results: The median age of enrolled patients was 53 years and most self-reported as being of Asian or White race and neither Latino nor Hispanic ethnicity. The study independent data monitoring committee halted enrollment at 2199 of 2300 planned patients. All patients stopped atezolizumab following a planned early interim and futility analysis. The trial continued to a premature final analysis. With invasive disease-free survival events in 141 patients (12.8%) treated with atezolizumab-chemotherapy and 125 (11.4%) with chemotherapy alone (median follow-up, 32 months), the final stratified invasive disease-free survival hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.87-1.42; P = .38). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the regimen of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with more treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (54% vs 44%) but similar incidences of fatal adverse events (0.8% vs 0.6%) and adverse events leading to chemotherapy discontinuation. Chemotherapy exposure was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The addition of the immune therapy drug atezolizumab to chemotherapy after surgery did not provide benefit among patients with triple-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrent disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03498716.

Identifiers

PMID39883436
PMCPMC11783246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.