ReviewMolecular diversity2025
Explanatory review on DDR inhibitors: their biological activity, synthetic route, and structure-activity relationship.
Review in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DDR2 expression on circulating lymphocytes and monocytes associates with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Pyrrolopyrimidines: Design, Synthesis and Antitumor Properties of Novel Tricyclic Pyrrolo [2,3-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the halogenated spirooxindoles as novel anticancer scaffolds: chemistry and bioactivity approach.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discoidin domain receptors (DDR) are categorized under tyrosine kinase receptors (RTKs) and play a crucial role in various etiological conditions such as cancer, fibrosis, atherosclerosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory diseases. The structural domain rearrangement of DDR1 and DDR2 involved six domains of interest namely N-terminal DS, DS-like, intracellular juxtamembrane, transmembrane juxtamembrane, extracellular juxtamembrane intracellular kinase domain, and the tail portion contains small C-tail linkage. DDR has not been explored to a wide extent to be declared as a prime target for any particular pathological condition. Very few scientific data are available so there is a need to study the receptors and their inhibitors. Still, there did not exist FDA-approved small molecules targeting DDR1 and DDR2 receptors so there is an urgent need to develop potent small molecules. Further, the structural features and ligand specificities encourage the researchers to be fascinated about the DDR and explore them for the mentioned biological conditions. Therefore, in the last few years, researchers have been involved in investigating the potent DDR inhibitors. The current review provides an outlook on the anatomy and physiology of DDR, focusing on the structural features of DDR receptors and the mechanism of signaling pathways. We have also compiled the evolutionary development status of DDR inhibitors according to their chemical classes, biological activity, selectivity, and structure-activity relationship. From biological activity analysis, it was revealed that compounds 64a (selectivity: DDR1) and 103a (selectivity: DDR2) were the most potent candidates with excellent activity with IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
39883387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.