Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Real-world application of CCTA with CT-FFR for coronary assessment pre-TAVI: the CT2TAVI study.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Ruling Out Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly Patients Candidates to TAVI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- FFR-CT: Technical Advances and Implementation in Clinical Practice.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular CT in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review of Advances, Clinical Integration, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography in Ruling Out Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the implementation of concomitant CAD assessment on pre-TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) planning CTA (CT angiography) aided by CT-FFR (CT-fractional flow reserve) [The CT2TAVI protocol] and investigates the incremental value of CT-FFR to coronary CT angiography (CCTA) alone in the evaluation of patients undergoing CT2TAVI. This is a prospective observational real-world cohort study at an academic health system on consecutive patients who underwent CTA for TAVI planning from 1/2021 to 6/2022. This represented a transition period in our health system, from not formally reporting CAD on pre-TAVI planning CTA (Group A) to routinely reporting CAD on pre-TAVI CTA (Group B; CT2TAVI protocol). All CTAs were retrospective ECG-gated using a dual source 192 slice CT scanner without nitrate or intravenous beta blocker premedication. We assessed downstream ICA and revascularization pre-TAVI and clinical outcomes 30 days and 1 year post-TAVI in both groups. 307 patients were included with 199 patients in Group A and 108 patients in Group B. In Group B, ICA was performed pre-TAVI in only 40.7% of patients. The use of CT-FFR, which was primarily aimed at identifying hemodynamically significant proximal vessel disease, helped avoid downstream invasive testing for 60.5% (23/38) of patients who were deemed to have obstructive proximal vessel disease using CCTA alone or had one or more uninterpretable proximal segments using CCTA. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and need for revascularization at 1-year post-TAVI were comparable between groups with a higher trend toward heart failure hospitalizations in Group A. Routine ICA can safely be deferred pre-TAVI, with the CT2TAVI strategy using modern CT scanners aided by CT-FFR analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39883381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.