ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Ovarian function after COVID-19: long-term effects and vaccine safety in ART patients.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Long COVID on the Female Reproductive System: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- COVID-19 and female reproductive health: pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical reproductive outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with embryos generated from COVID‑19 infection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Comment on "Ovarian function after COVID-19: long-term effects and vaccine safety in ART patients".Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of mild COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination on ovarian function in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Specifically, we assessed ovarian outcomes between 9 and 18 months post-infection and investigated the effects of COVID-19 vaccines (inactivated virus and adenovirus) on reproductive parameters.
methodsThe study included two objectives: (a) examining ovarian function in post-COVID-19 patients (9-18 months post-infection) compared to a control group and (b) comparing reproductive outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients. According to the study objectives, ART patients were divided into the following groups: a control group (n = 30), a post-COVID-19 group (n = 55), an unvaccinated group (n = 70), and a vaccinated group (n = 55). Findings revealed a reduction in the number of retrieved and mature oocytes in patients over 36 years in the post-COVID-19 group. Lower IL-1β levels were found in follicular fluid (FF) of post-COVID-19 patients, while VEGF levels were reestablished between 9 and 18 months post-infection. Although cell migration was reduced in endothelial cells incubated with post-COVID-19 FF, angiogenic factor levels and DNA integrity remained stable. No significant differences in retrieved or mature oocytes were observed between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
conclusionsVEGF levels and DNA integrity in FF from post-COVID-19 patients were normalized between 9 and 18 months post-infection. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination did not negatively impact ovarian response in ART patients, supporting vaccine safety in reproductive contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.