ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2025
Lipid Levels and Lung Cancer Risk: Findings from the Taiwan National Data Systems from 2012 to 2018.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLipids are known to be involved in carcinogenesis, but the associations between lipid profiles and different lung cancer histological classifications remain unknown.
methodsIndividuals who participated in national adult health surveillance from 2012 to 2018 were included. For patients who developed lung cancer during follow-up, a 1:2 control group of nonlung cancer participants was selected after matching. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to explore the associations between lipid profiles, different lung cancer histological classifications and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation statuses. Subgroup, sensitivity, and dose‒response analyses were also performed.
resultsA total of 4,704,853 participants (30,337 lung cancer participants and 4,674,516 nonlung cancer participants) were included. In both the main and sensitivity analyses, the associations remained constant between lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and a higher risk of lung cancer (main analysis: odds ratio: 1.13 [1.08-1.18]) and squamous cell carcinoma (1.29 [1.16-1.43]). Hypertriglyceridemia was associated with a lower risk of adenocarcinoma (0.90 [0.84-0.96]) and a higher risk of small cell lung cancer (1.31 [1.11-1.55]). Hypercholesterolemia was associated with a lower risk of squamous cell carcinoma (0.84 [0.76-0.94]). In the subgroup analysis, lower HDL cholesterol levels were associated with greater risk across most subgroups. HDL cholesterol levels also demonstrated a dose‒response association with the development of lung cancer.
conclusionsThe distinct associations between specific lipid profiles and lung cancer subtypes suggest that lipid metabolism may play different mechanistic roles in lung cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.