Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883229›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

The microsurgical infratentorial supracerebellar approach for lesions of the pineal gland: feasibility, morbidity, and functional outcomes from a single-center experience.

Mamoun Ahmed, Roman Arend, Niels Nordin, Martin Scholz, Bogdana Suchorska, Robert Lucaciu, Suzin Jung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What is the best surgical approach for Pineal Region Tumors? A systematic literature review and anatomical comparative study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mamoun AhmedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany. mamoun.ahmed@sana.de.
Roman ArendDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Niels NordinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Martin ScholzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Bogdana SuchorskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Robert Lucaciu *Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Suzin Jung *Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pineal gland lesions pose a significant surgical challenge due to the deep-seated nature of the pineal gland, as well as the limited field of view, and the complex vascular anatomy. The mainstay of surgical treatment, when necessary, is always histopathological clarity and gross total resection (GTR). We evaluate the surgical outcomes for pineal gland lesions, shedding light on functional outcomes, histological findings, and surgical complications. We analyzed patients with pineal gland lesions who underwent surgical treatment in our institution between September 2013 and May 2022. Patient demographics, clinical symptoms, surgical approaches, resection extent, surgery-related complications, and histopathological diagnosis were studied. Pre- and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and were compared using the Student´s t-test. 32 patients (13 males, 19 females) were included. The mean age was 39 years old. We adopted the infratentorial supracerebellar approach (ITSC) in a semi-sitting position. 2 of these patients received preoperatively an endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV) combined with endoscopic biopsy. The mean operating time for the ITSC approach was 170 min, whereas 53 min for the ETV with endoscopic biopsy. The mean length of stay was 13 days. The most common histopathological diagnosis was pineal cysts (38%). Surgical mortality was 0%, and morbidity was 28%. GTR was possible in 72% of patients treated using the ITSC approach. There was a functional outcome improvement, with a statistical significance measured via the Student´s t-test (p = 0.047). The ITSC approach remains safe and feasible when performed by an experienced surgical team, yielding a histopathological diagnosis and improvement of functional status.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMicrosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresPineal GlandPinealomaAdolescentAdultAgedChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsMicrosurgeryNeurosurgeryPineal cystsPineal glandSupracerebellar-infratentorial approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.