ReviewCell and tissue research2025
Roots and early routes of neuroendocrinology.
Review in Cell and tissue research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoneuroendocrine, circadian and seasonal systems: from photoneuroendocrinology to circadian biology and medicine.Cell and tissue research · 2025Review
- Special issue 100th anniversary Cell and Tissue Research.Cell and tissue research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carl C. Speidel (1919) and Ernst Scharrer (1928) were privileged witnesses of the encounter between neurons and hormones, a biological phenomenon that had been occurring in nature during millions of years of evolution, as Berta Scharrer started to unfold since 1935 on. The story of neurosecretion is intimately associated to that of the hypothalamus, such a "marvellous region", as Wolfgang Bargmann (1975) called it. This story started more than two millennia ago. We have made an effort to trace the roots of the discoveries that gave rise to a medical discipline, neuroendocrinology. Our trip to the roots covers a period from the fourth century BC, when an extraordinary Medical School was founded in Alexandria, and extends into the late 1970s of the twentieth century, when neuroendocrine research had started to grow exponentially. An effort has been made to track back the origin of each piece of knowledge that was constructing, brick upon brick, the building of this new medical science, hoping that it would help neuroendocrinologists of the new era to find their own roots, to meet their ancestors. Tracking the roots of a particular phenomenon provides the opportunity to have an overview of the whole phenomenon, allowing comprehension rather than merely knowledge. An important purpose pursued throughout this article was to pay a tribute to all those who, in the early days, contributed to the brain-endocrine encounter. We have tried our best to bring back the achievements of most of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39883141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.