ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2025
Deep Learning-Powered CT-Less Multitracer Organ Segmentation From PET Images: A Solution for Unreliable CT Segmentation in PET/CT Imaging.
Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Trial
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Cancer Theranostics Workflow: Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Future Clinical Translation.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Review
- Emerging frontiers and challenges of artificial intelligence in PSMA-PET imaging: pioneering a new chapter in prostate cancer care.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- TASC-SwinMT: Task-Adaptive Synergistic Cross-Task Swin Multi-Task Framework for CT and MRI Image Interpolation and Segmentation.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based CT-Less Cardiac Segmentation of PET Images: A Robust Methodology for Multi-Tracer Nuclear Cardiovascular Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Towards practical radiopharmaceutical treatment planning: a review of dosimetry simplification techniques.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Anatomically and metabolically informed diffusion for unified denoising and segmentation in low-count PET imaging.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Variations in radiomic features of the femoral head and neck during helical tomotherapy in prostate and rectal cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of ultra-low-dose CT images using an optimized nnU-Net model.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Preoperative prediction of pulmonary ground-glass nodule infiltration status by CT-based radiomics combined with neural networks.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe common approach for organ segmentation in hybrid imaging relies on coregistered CT (CTAC) images. This method, however, presents several limitations in real clinical workflows where mismatch between PET and CT images are very common. Moreover, low-dose CTAC images have poor quality, thus challenging the segmentation task. Recent advances in CT-less PET imaging further highlight the necessity for an effective PET organ segmentation pipeline that does not rely on CT images. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a CT-less multitracer PET segmentation framework. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe collected 2062 PET/CT images from multiple scanners. The patients were injected with either 18 F-FDG (1487) or 68 Ga-PSMA (575). PET/CT images with any kind of mismatch between PET and CT images were detected through visual assessment and excluded from our study. Multiple organs were delineated on CT components using previously trained in-house developed nnU-Net models. The segmentation masks were resampled to coregistered PET images and used to train 4 different deep learning models using different images as input, including noncorrected PET (PET-NC) and attenuation and scatter-corrected PET (PET-ASC) for 18 F-FDG (tasks 1 and 2, respectively using 22 organs) and PET-NC and PET-ASC for 68 Ga tracers (tasks 3 and 4, respectively, using 15 organs). The models' performance was evaluated in terms of Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and segment volume difference.
resultsThe average Dice coefficient over all organs was 0.81 ± 0.15, 0.82 ± 0.14, 0.77 ± 0.17, and 0.79 ± 0.16 for tasks 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. PET-ASC models outperformed PET-NC models ( P < 0.05) for most of organs. The highest Dice values were achieved for the brain (0.93 to 0.96 in all 4 tasks), whereas the lowest values were achieved for small organs, such as the adrenal glands. The trained models showed robust performance on dynamic noisy images as well.
conclusionsDeep learning models allow high-performance multiorgan segmentation for 2 popular PET tracers without the use of CT information. These models may tackle the limitations of using CT segmentation in PET/CT image quantification, kinetic modeling, radiomics analysis, dosimetry, or any other tasks that require organ segmentation masks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.