SynthesisFuture cardiology2025
Multivalvular vs single-valve infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Future cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstruction of the Aorto-Mitral Curtain in Complex Infective Endocarditis: A Contemporary Narrative Review of the Commando Procedure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Bilateral valvular involvement in infective endocarditis: A clinically distinct entity? A multicenter retrospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfective endocarditis is characterized by the colonization of heart valves by virulent microorganisms. It commonly manifests as involvement of a single heart valve -single-valve infective endocarditis (SIE), while in some patients, two or more heart valves are concomitantly infected -multivalvular infective endocarditis (MIE). The risk of complications and prognosis of MIE as opposed to SIE are unknown.
methodsWe performed a systematic search in MEDLINE and Scopus for studies of patients with MIE and SIE. The outcomes of interest included mortality, heart failure, systemic embolic events, and need for surgery.
resultsΟf 1,124 identified studies, eleven met the inclusion criteria. MIE was reported in 20.4% of the total patients. Compared to SIE, MIE was associated with increased risk of short-term mortality (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.39), one-year mortality (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08-1.34), heart failure (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54), systemic embolic events (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22), and need for subsequent surgical management (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.41).
conclusionsPatients with MIE have a higher likelihood of poor prognosis compared to patients with SIE. A high clinical suspicion of this condition and timely diagnosis and management are imperative while managing patients with infective endocarditis. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023486674.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.