ArticleActa crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances2025
A physical optics formulation of Bloch waves and its application to 4D STEM, 3D ED and inelastic scattering simulations.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloch waves are often used in dynamical diffraction calculations, such as simulating electron diffraction intensities for crystal structure refinement. However, this approach relies on matrix diagonalization and is therefore computationally expensive for large unit cell crystals. Here Bloch wave theory is re-formulated using the physical optics concepts underpinning the multislice method. In particular, the multislice phase grating and propagator functions are expressed in matrix form using elements of the Bloch wave structure matrix. The specimen is divided into thin slices, and the evolution of the electron wavefunction through the specimen calculated using the Bloch phase grating and propagator matrices. By decoupling specimen scattering from free space propagation of the electron beam, many computationally demanding simulations, such as 4D STEM imaging modes, 3D ED precession and rotation electron diffraction, phonon and plasmon inelastic scattering, are considerably simplified. The computational cost scales as {\cal O}({N^2} ) per slice, compared with {\cal O}({N^3} ) for a standard Bloch wave calculation, where N is the number of diffracted beams. For perfect crystals the performance can at times be better than multislice, since only the important Bragg reflections in the otherwise sparse diffraction plane are calculated. The physical optics formulation of Bloch waves is therefore an important step towards more routine dynamical diffraction simulation of large data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.