Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Re-evaluating large for gestational age: differential effects on perinatal outcomes in term and premature births.

Chun-Heng Kuo, Yi-Ling Wu, Chi-Nien Chen, Yu-Ru Lo, I-Weng Yen, Kang-Chih Fan, Yi-Yun Tai, Ming-Wei Lin, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Hung-Yuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chun-Heng Kuo *Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling Wu *Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Chi-Nien ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yu-Ru LoInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
I-Weng YenDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Kang-Chih FanDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-Yun TaiDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Wei LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chih-Cheng HsuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Hung-Yuan Li *Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pregnancies with large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses are associated with increased risks of various adverse perinatal outcomes. While existing research primarily focuses on term neonates, less is known about preterm neonates. This study aims to explore the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes associated with LGA in term neonates and neonates with different degrees of prematurity, compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates. Methods: Using the Birth Reporting Databases (2007-2018) linked to Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study of singleton neonates delivered between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Based on gestational age at delivery, the enrolled neonates were classified into term (37-42 weeks of gestation), late preterm (34-36 weeks of gestation), moderate preterm (32-33 weeks of gestation), very preterm (28-31 weeks of gestation), and extremely preterm (24-27 weeks of gestation). LGA was defined by the 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) growth standard and the Taiwan growth standard. Perinatal outcomes were compared between LGA and AGA neonates across different gestational age groups. Results: Among the 1,602,638 neonates, 44,359 were classified as LGA by the 2013 WHO growth standard. Compared to AGA neonates, LGA neonates in term and late preterm groups exhibited higher risks of primary cesarean section, prolonged labor, neonatal hypoglycemia, birth trauma, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, jaundice needing phototherapy, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, newborn sepsis, and fetal death. However, most of these risks were not increased in moderate, very, and extremely preterm groups. Conversely, being LGA was associated with lower risks of primary cesarean section (very preterm group), jaundice needing phototherapy (moderate and very preterm groups), respiratory distress (moderate and very preterm groups), NICU admission (moderate and very preterm groups), newborn sepsis (very preterm group), retinopathy of prematurity (late, moderate, and very preterm groups), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (very preterm group). These findings remained consistent when the Taiwan growth standard was applied. Conclusion: Being LGA is associated with increased risks of perinatal complications in term and late preterm neonates, but not in earlier preterm groups. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring management strategies for LGA neonates to consider different degrees of prematurity.

Indexed as

fetal deathlarge for gestational ageneonatal deathperinatal outcomesprematuritypreterm

Identifiers

PMID39882534
PMCPMC11774698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.