ArticleDEN open2025
Reopenable clip over-the-line method in endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors: A historical control study.
Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Gastrointestinal Subepithelial and Epithelial Neoplasia: Current Status, Indications, and Technical and Oncological Challenges-A Multispecialty Perspective.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumor: A Technical Analysis Study (With Video).DEN open · 2026Article
- UTILITY OF THE REOPENABLE CLIP-OVER-THE-LINE METHOD FOR DEFECT CLOSURE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC INTERMUSCULAR DISSECTION OF RECTAL DEEP SUBMUCOSAL INVASIVE CANCER.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors is gradually gaining popularity, and secure and amenable closure is key to its success. This study aimed to compare the reopenable clip over-the-line method with the purse-string method for defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors. Methods: This historical control trial included 37 consecutive patients with 37 gastric submucosal tumors, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection between January 2021 and July 2024. All lesions were resected en bloc. After excluding three patients who underwent non-full-thickness resection, 34 patients were analyzed. Post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defects were closed using the purse-string method ( Results: The median (interquartile range) time for defect closure was longer in the reopenable clip over-the-line method group of 33 (31-57) min than in the purse-string method group of 26 (24-35) min ( Conclusions: Reopenable clip over-the-line method facilitated secure post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defect closure, reduced post-procedural abdominal pain, and shortened the fasting and hospitalization periods after endoscopic full-thickness resection in gastric submucosal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.