ArticleHeliyon2025
Arsenic, manganese, and iron concentration in groundwater of northwestern part of Bangladesh using self-organizing maps: Implication for health risk assessment.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact Assessment and Sustainable Remediation of Heavy Metal and Radioactive Contamination in Aquatic Systems: A Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Review
- Evaluation of toxic metal contamination and source allocation in agricultural soils of Chhattisgarh, India: multivariate and artificial network approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantification of the non-linear relationship between arsenic (As) and physico-chemical parameters in groundwater through a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was performed for the first time in Chapai-Nawabganj, Bangladesh. Due to the continuous assessment of groundwater quality, the spatial distribution of As with associated elements was observed for the aerial extent of contaminated groundwater. The results exhibited that 57 % and 31 % of groundwater samples (n = 35) exceeded the allowable limit of As according to the WHO recommended drinking water standard (10 μg/L) and Bangladesh Drinking Water Standard (BDWS) (50 μg/L), respectively. The spatial distribution map of As demonstrated that a higher concentration of As in groundwater was found in the central portion of the study area and less amount was observed in the eastern part. Whereas 83 % of the samples for iron (Fe) concentration in groundwater surpassed the WHO guideline limit (0.3 mg/L) and were distributed all over the area except in the central part. Moreover, manganese (Mn) concentration varied from place to place within the allowable limit of WHO. The SOM analysis elucidated the non-linear relationship of As with other elements in two-dimensional planes of having 49 nodes (7 × 7), which incorporated with Spearman's correlation coefficient quantified the positive correlation among As, Mn and Ca, and negative correlation among As, Fe, EC and pH. In accordance with human health risk was also explained in terms of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk. Health risk assessment demonstrated that higher health hazard (HQ) values in 57 % of the samples exceeded the threshold value for adults through the oral route, which implied the potential non-carcinogenic health risk, while 63 % of the samples for cancer risk (CR) was higher than the allowable limit indicating the considerable cancer risk zone for the residents of the area. This analysis provides information to the planners for formulating effective groundwater resources management and minimizing health sustainably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.