ArticleHeliyon2025
Long-term performance and durability of lime-stabilized oil-contaminated soils.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oil-rich regions, the increasing risk of oil spills on soil is largely attributed to intensified extraction and transportation activities. This situation necessitates a focus on the short-term and long-term strength of contaminated soils. While existing literature primarily evaluates the oil-contaminated soils over short-term periods, typically up to 28 days, it is essential to investigate their long-term performance, extending the evaluation period to 365 days. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding the long-term performance of soils contaminated with 4 %, 7 %, and 10 % oil by evaluating the effectiveness of lime stabilization over a one-year period. Laboratory tests were conducted on soils treated with varying lime contents (0 %, 3 %, 6 %, and 9 %) and cured for 1, 14, 28, and 365 days. Key performance indicators, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and durability under wet-dry cycles, were measured. The results demonstrate that a 6 % lime content significantly improves long-term UCS, with strength gains ranging from 16.6 % to 24.5 % while enhancing resilience to wet-dry cycles. Microstructural analyses confirmed the formation of calcium-aluminum-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H) phases, contributing to the observed strength and durability improvements. This research underscores the potential of lime stabilization as a sustainable solution for managing oil-contaminated soils, reducing reliance on raw materials, and promoting more sustainable infrastructure development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.