ArticleHeliyon2025
Safety and efficacy of sugammadex in management of patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing general anesthesia: A systematic review.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugammadex versus Neostigmine Reversal After Thoracoscopic Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Cyclodextrin-based therapeutics delivery systems: A review of current clinical trials.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze available evidence on efficacy and safety of sugammadex in reversing neuromuscular blockades in patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG), thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of its potential benefits and risks in this specific patient population. Methods: We performed a systematic search for studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Sources were screened using Rayyan, following predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria focusing on English articles published from 2010 to 2024 on MG patients under general anesthesia. Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted, and quality was appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Results: Out of 361 initial citations, 24 studies met inclusion criteria. Sugammadex demonstrated rapid and effective reversal of neuromuscular blockades, with ToF recovery times ranging from 79.7 s to 10 min, and short extubation times. The incidence of postoperative myasthenic crisis was low, and no mortalities were reported. Conclusion: Sugammadex may serve as a reasonable option for the reversal of neuromuscular blockades in MG patients, indicating potential for rapid recovery and a relatively low incidence of serious complications. However, due to the limited number of studies and the nature of the evidence available, further large-scale and rigorous investigations are warranted to better establish its superiority over traditional reversal agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.