ArticleHeliyon2025
Application of the modified RIAM method in assessing the environmental impact of municipal solid waste management scenarios (A case study).
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) is a widely utilized tool for evaluating environmental impacts in municipal solid waste management. However, the traditional RIAM (T-RIAM) method includes ambiguities in its scoring classification, which can hinder decision-making accuracy. This study introduces a modified RIAM approach, enhancing classification precision by refining impact categories, making it particularly valuable for projects constrained by time and resources. Using the Nazlou landfill in Urmia, Iran, as a case study, two waste management scenarios were assessed: (1) constructing a new landfill cell with leachate treatment facilities and (2) adding a composting plant to divert organic waste. The second scenario was identified as the optimal choice due to its positive environmental impacts across physical-chemical, biological-ecological, and socio-cultural domains, as well as its high public acceptance. Under the proposed classification scheme, the "+E," "+D," and "-C″ impacts for this scenario decreased from 3, 7, and 3 (as per T-RIAM) to 2, 2, and 0, respectively. The refined scoring system allowed sharper differentiation, with only the most significant impacts classified in "+E″ or "-E″ categories, facilitating clearer decision-making compared to T-RIAM. Additionally, the streamlined classification approach reduces the need for extensive data inputs, making the modified RIAM an efficient alternative to resource-intensive methods like life cycle assessment for preliminary evaluations. Beyond waste management, the modified RIAM framework has potential applications in addressing broader environmental challenges, including water resource management, air quality assessment, and infrastructure planning, offering versatile utility for municipal decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.