Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025

Measuring adjustment of siblings of children with disabilities: psychometric properties across translations, age groups and informants.

Linda K M Veerman, Stian Orm, Krister W Fjermestad, Torun M Vatne, Yngvild B Haukeland, Paula S Sterkenburg, Agnes M Willemen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Critical reflections on psychometric assessment of the NAS scale.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2025
    Article
  4. Next steps in the development of a sibling adjustment scale: reply to Supianto.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linda K M VeermanClinical Child & Family Studies, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-1661
Stian OrmDepartment of Psychology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-8264
Krister W FjermestadDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-0033
Torun M VatneDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-4859
Yngvild B HaukelandThe Blue Cross, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9759-6944
Paula S SterkenburgClinical Child & Family Studies, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-7539
Agnes M WillemenClinical Child & Family Studies, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-2608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Negative Adjustment Scale (NAS) is used to measure adjustment to having a sibling with a disability. However, several adaptations to the scale have been made, and implementation varies across studies and countries. This study examined the psychometric properties across different versions and provides directions for future use and development of the NAS. Methods: The sample comprised 400 siblings aged 6-16 years old from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. Measurement invariance was assessed across age groups (8-11 vs. 12-16 years) and translations (Norwegian vs. Dutch), using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the parent version were assessed among 102 parents from the Dutch sample. Results: The internal consistency of the NAS was acceptable to good in all versions. A single factor model held across age groups and translations, although higher order invariance was not supported. The child and parent report versions of the NAS did not significantly correlate. Conclusions: The NAS generally has sufficient psychometric properties. However, these vary across age groups, translations, and informants, causing the NAS to be less appropriate for comparisons between groups. Further adaptation of the NAS or developing a new scale for siblings of children with disabilities, is advised.

Indexed as

invariancenegative adjustmentpsychometricsquestionnaireSiblings

Identifiers

PMID39882423
PMCPMC11774191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.