ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Oral behaviors in Chinese temporomandibular disorder patients: insights from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing the Latent Structure of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: Integrating Bayesian Factor Analysis and Network Analysis.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Correlations of oral behaviors, pain, and psychological distress among patients with temporomandibular disorders: clinical investigation of axial II evaluation.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Bruxism and other jaw loading behaviours are associated with somatic symptoms and psychological distress in orofacial pain-free adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the factor structure of the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC) in Chinese temporomandibular disorder (TMDs) patients and compare the outcomes with those of Western patients. Additionally, it examined the correlations between different OBC subscale scoring methods. Methods: A total of 869 patients completed a survey that included demographic information, the Symptom Questionnaire, and OBC. This was followed by a clinical examination and diagnosis based on the Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs (DC/TMDs). Exploratory factor analysis, along with confirmatory factor analysis, was applied to waking-state oral behaviors, revealing two key factors: Chinese non-functional (C-NFA) and functional (C-FA) oral activities. Items were contrasted with those of Italian TMDs patients (I-NFA and I-FA), and subscale scores were computed, compared, and correlated using Kruskal Wallis and Post-hoc and Spearman's rank-order correlation ( Results: Variations in NFA and FA items were observed between Chinese and Italian TMDs patients. For both NFA scoring methods, significant differences were noted between pain-related and intra-articular TMDs. The C-NFA and I-NFA, as well as C-FA and I-FA, scoring methods yielded scores with strong correlations (r > 0.8). Conclusion: NFA and FA subscale items were determined for Chinese TMDs patients. Despite item discrepancies, C-NFA and C-FA scores were strongly correlated with I-NFA and I-FA scores, respectively. The OBC can be effectively simplified for use with Chinese TMDs patients. Developing and validating an East-West short-form version of the OBC should be prioritized, given the variations in oral behaviors across countries and cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.