SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Efficacy and safety of cardiac myosin inhibitors for symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy of pharmacological therapies in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a frequentist network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Myosin inhibitors for treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common genetic heart disorder. It is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired cardiac function, with forms categorized into obstructive (oHCM) and nonobstructive (nHCM). Traditional treatments address symptoms but not the underlying disease mechanism, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Cardiac myosin inhibitors such as mavacamten and aficamten present potential new treatment options. Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing cardiac myosin inhibitors with placebo were reviewed, and outcomes related to NYHA functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS), LVOT gradients, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were analyzed. Results: Six RCTs involving 826 participants demonstrated that mavacamten and aficamten significantly improved NYHA functional class and KCCQ-CSS scores. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) was similar between the treatment and control groups, indicating a comparable safety profile. Conclusion: Cardiac myosin inhibitors are effective in improving cardiac function and reducing LVOT obstruction in HCM patients. They offer a promising alternative to current treatments, with a safety profile comparable to placebo. Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.