ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2024
Primary care providers' perspectives on referrals to the Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative comparative study across varied referral patterns.
Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying the ORBIT model to design a patient-facing mHealth app for diabetes prevention in urban primary care: translating patient perspectives into app design.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Programmes (DPP) in reducing diabetes risk, primary care provider (PCP) referrals remain low, especially among men and racial/ethnic minorities, exacerbating their under-representation in DPPs. Understanding PCPs' perspectives on referrals is crucial for enhancing the intervention's reach and effectiveness. Research design and methods: We conducted a qualitative study to explore PCPs' experiences, perspectives and engagement with DPP referrals, focusing on factors influencing variations in referral rates. Based on electronic record data, high and low-referring PCPs from a large integrated health system in the Bronx, NY, participated in interviews conducted between February and September 2023. Interviews were conducted and recorded on Zoom, anonymised, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method. Results: From 22 PCP interviews, 4 themes emerged representing factors that influenced referrals: (1) perceived barriers to the patient engagement with the DPP, including infrastructure gaps, programme accessibility issues and unmet social needs, particularly affecting low-referring PCPs; (2) perceived effectiveness of the DPP, with concerns raised about its efficacy, especially for male and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients; (3) perceived self-efficacy in referring patients, driven by knowledge gaps and limited opportunities, especially among low-referrers and (4) recommendations to facilitate and strengthen referrals, highlighting areas for PCP and patient support. The perspectives of high-referring/low-referring PCPs often differed across these themes and associated subthemes. Conclusions: Our research illuminates the challenges PCPs face in treating prediabetic patients and factors influencing DPP referrals in underserved populations. This understanding can guide interventions to enhance equitable DPP referrals and engagement, thereby reducing diabetes risk in vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.