Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882234›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025

Efficiency of Real-time Computer-aided Polyp Detection during Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Pilot Study.

Shin Morimoto, Hidenori Tanaka, Yudai Takehara, Noriko Yamamoto, Fumiaki Tanino, Yuki Kamigaichi, Ken Yamashita, Hidehiko Takigawa, Yuji Urabe, Toshio Kuwai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shin MorimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hidenori TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yudai TakeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Noriko YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Fumiaki TaninoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuki KamigaichiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ken YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hidehiko TakigawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuji UrabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshio KuwaiGastrointestinal Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shiro OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Studies have suggested that computer-aided polyp detection using artificial intelligence improves adenoma identification during colonoscopy. However, its real-world effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the usefulness of computer-aided detection during regular surveillance colonoscopy. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy with computer-aided detection between January and March 2023 and had undergone colonoscopy at least twice during the past 3 years were recruited. The clinicopathological findings of lesions identified using computer-aided detection were evaluated. The detection ability was sub-analyzed based on the expertise of the endoscopist and the presence of diminutive adenomas (size ≤5 mm). Results: A total of 78 patients were included. Computer-aided detection identified 46 adenomas in 28 patients; however, no carcinomas were identified. The mean withdrawal time was 824 ± 353 s, and the mean tumor diameter was 3.3 mm (range, 2-8 mm). The most common gross type was 0-Is (70%), followed by 0-Isp (17%) and 0-IIa (13%). The most common tumor locations were the ascending colon and sigmoid colon (28%), followed by the transverse colon (26%), cecum (7%), descending colon (7%), and rectum (4%). Overall, 34.1% and 38.2% of patients with untreated diminutive adenomas and those with no adenomas, respectively, had newly detected adenomas. Endoscopist expertise did not affect the results. Conclusions: Computer-aided detection may help identify adenomas during surveillance colonoscopy for patients with untreated diminutive adenomas and those with a history of endoscopic resection.

Indexed as

adenomaartificial intelligencecolorectal neoplasmcost-effectiveness analysisearly diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39882234
PMCPMC11772792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.