Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882232›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025

Efficacy of Endoscopic Evaluation and Hemostatic Intervention for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Bleeding.

Katsuhisa Ohashi, Katsuhide Ohashi, Akinori Sasaki, Kazuyoshi Ota, Kazutomo Kitagawa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katsuhisa OhashiOhashi Icho Komon Geka Iin, Niihama, Japan.
Katsuhide OhashiOhashi Icho Komon Geka Iin, Niihama, Japan.
Akinori SasakiJuzen General Hospital, Niihama, Japan.
Kazuyoshi OtaJuzen General Hospital, Niihama, Japan.
Kazutomo KitagawaJuzen General Hospital, Niihama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving hemostasis during post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding (PHB) is often challenging owing to poor visibility within the anal canal. We investigated the feasibility of using endoscopy for observation and maintaining hemostasis during PHB. Endoscopic evaluation was performed in patients with normal vital signs and no severe pain or excessive bleeding was observed during proctoscopy. Hemostatic clipping was performed if the bleeding site was clearly identified. In cases with profuse bleeding and endoscopic hemostasis deemed difficult, surgical hemostasis was performed. Of the 14 patients who developed PHB during the 3-year study period, endoscopic observation was performed in 6 cases. Arterial bleeding was confirmed in five of these cases; while, spontaneous hemostasis had already occurred in the remaining case. Hemostasis was achieved with endoscopic clipping in all cases. The mean procedure time was 14.7 minutes with no adverse events or re-bleeding. Endoscopic evaluation for PHB provides a detailed view of the bleeding site and facilitates hemostasis using clips.

Indexed as

endoscopic hemostasishemorrhoidectomypost-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding (PHB)

Identifiers

PMID39882232
PMCPMC11772797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.