Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882231›Full record

ReviewJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.

Masaaki Miyo, Emi Akizuki, Koichi Okuya, Ai Noda, Masayuki Ishii, Ryo Miura, Momoko Ichihara, Maho Toyota, Kohei Okamoto, Tatsuya Ito and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Masaaki MiyoDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Emi AkizukiDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Koichi OkuyaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ai NodaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Masayuki IshiiDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ryo MiuraDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Momoko IchiharaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Maho ToyotaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kohei OkamotoDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tatsuya ItoDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yuji AkiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defecation disorders following rectal resection have long been overlooked as an inevitable surgical complication due to the lack of established diagnostic criteria or definitions. However, these disorders have been recently termed low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which is a defecation disorder that occurs following rectal resection and impairs the patient's quality of life (QOL). The LARS score developed by Emmertsen et al., which is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the severity of bowel dysfunction following rectal surgery by scoring the major symptoms of LARS, facilitates the diagnosis and assessment of LARS and enables international comparison and validation through the use of validated scores generated according to the international standards. Based on comparisons with other evaluation instruments, the use of the LARS score is strongly recommended internationally for LARS screening in patients following rectal resection. Recent findings have indicated that multiple pathophysiological changes, including reservoir function and evacuation of the neorectum, anal sphincter function, negative impact of a diverting stoma, autonomic denervation, and radiotherapy, are involved in the etiology of LARS. Due to the lack of established treatments and prevention of LARS, a suggested treatment chart for patients with LARS was presented in the Management Guidelines for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (MANUEL) project. Future surgical treatment should focus not only on the radical cure of cancer and safety of treatment but also on the maintenance and improvement of QOL, with particular attention to the preservation of function. Particularly for rectal cancer, surgeons must formulate treatment plans that consider the prevention and treatment of LARS.

Indexed as

low anterior resection syndromelow anterior resection syndrome scorerectal cancerrectal resection

Identifiers

PMID39882231
PMCPMC11772791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.