ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025
Radiomics-based Machine Learning Approach to Predict Chemotherapy Responses in Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delta-Radiomics Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Treated with Cetuximab Plus Avelumab (CAVE Trial).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Colorectal cancer liver metastases: A radiologic point of view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting the recurrence risk of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: a study based on preoperative CT intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Improving early liver metastasis detection in colorectal cancer using a weighted ensemble of ResNet50 and swin transformer: a KHCC study.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
- Development and independent validation of explainable radiomics-based machine learning models for prognosis in colorectal liver metastases.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study explored the clinical utility of CT radiomics-driven machine learning as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients. Methods: We included 150 CRLM patients who underwent first-line doublet chemotherapy, dividing them into a training cohort (n=112) and a test cohort (n=38). We manually delineated three-dimensional tumor volumes, selecting the largest liver metastasis for measurement, using pretreatment portal-phase CT images and extracted 107 radiomics features. Treatment response was classified as responder (complete or partial response) or non-responder (stable or progressive disease), based on the best overall response according to RECIST criteria, version 1.1. Employing Random Forest and Boruta algorithms, we identified significant features for responder-non-responder differentiation. Radiomics signatures were developed and validated in the training cohort using five-fold cross-validation, and performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Among the patients, 91 (61%) were responders and 59 (39%) were non-responders. Variable selection with Boruta revealed three key parameters ("DependenceVariance," "ClusterShade," and "RunVariance"). In the training cohort, individual CT texture parameter AUCs ranged from 0.4 to 0.65, while the machine learning analysis incorporating all valid parameters exhibited a significantly higher AUC of 0.94 (p<0.01). The validation cohort also demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.87 for treatment response. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of CT radiomics-driven machine learning in predicting chemotherapy responses among CRLM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.