Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Predicting conversion to psychosis using machine learning: response to Cannon.

Jason Smucny, Tyrone D Cannon, Carrie E Bearden, Jean Addington, Kristen S Cadenhead, Barbara A Cornblatt, Matcheri Keshavan, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, William Stone and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jason SmucnyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Tyrone D CannonDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Carrie E BeardenDepartment of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jean AddingtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kristen S CadenheadDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Barbara A CornblattDepartment of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
Matcheri KeshavanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Diana O PerkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
William StoneDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Scott W WoodsDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Ian DavidsonDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Cameron S CarterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

STRESS AND EMOTIONAL REACTIVITYP50MH066286 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNON, TYRONE D · 2003 to 2014
$18.6M
1/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081902 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANNON, TYRONE D · 2008 to 2018
$12.4M
4/9-Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081857 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI CORNBLATT, BARBARA A. · 2008 to 2018
$6.2M
8/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082022 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, SCOTT W · 2008 to 2018
$6.0M
2/9 - Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081988 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, ELAINE FRAN · 2008 to 2018
$5.4M
6/9-Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081944 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CADENHEAD, KRISTIN S. · 2008 to 2018
$4.9M
Pathophysiology Informed Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Early Psychosis (PIB)R01MH122139 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CARTER, CAMERON S. · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Functional Brain Abnormalities in the Schizophrenia ProdromeR01MH076989 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHALON, DANIEL H · 2007 to 2014
$2.3M
Enhancing the Prospective Prediction of PsychosisU01MH066069 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PERKINS, DIANA O. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Predictive Markers and Mechanisms of Persistent Psychotic-like Experiences in Children: An Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study AnalysisK01MH125096 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SMUCNY, JASON · 2021 to 2025
$872k
Enhancing the Prospective Prediction of PsychosisU01MH066134 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI ADDINGTON, JEAN M · 2003 to 2007
$869k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH125096NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH066286NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076989NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122139NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066069NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066134NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081857NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081902NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081944NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081988NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We previously reported that machine learning could be used to predict conversion to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis with up to 90% accuracy using the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study-3 (NAPLS-3) dataset. A definitive test of our predictive model that was trained on the NAPLS-3 data, however, requires further support through implementation in an independent dataset. In this report we tested for model generalization using the previous iteration of NAPLS-3, the NAPLS-2, using the identical machine learning algorithms employed in our previous study. Method: Standard machine learning algorithms were trained to predict conversion to psychosis in clinical high risk individuals on the NAPLS-3 dataset and tested on the NAPLS-2 dataset. Results: NAPLS-2 and -3 individuals significantly differed on most features used in machine learning models. All models performed above chance, with Naive Bayes and random forest methods showing the best overall performance. Importantly, however, overall performance did not match those previously observed when using only NAPLS-3 data. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that a machine learning model trained to predict conversion to psychosis on one dataset can be used to train an independent dataset. Performance on the test set was not in the range necessary for clinical application, however. Possible reasons that limited performance are discussed.

Indexed as

clinical high risk (CHR)generalizabilityNAPLSout of sample evaluationscale of psychosis risk symptomsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39882161
PMCPMC11775650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.