ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Enhancing Perinatal Safety with the Advancement of Obstetric Anesthesia in Japan.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating perceived obstetric anesthesia training needs in residency education: a Taiwanese national survey.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Nationwide characterization of labor neuraxial analgesia provision in Japan using a publicly accessible database.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Association of intrapartum epidural analgesia and oxytocin exposure with offspring autism and neurodevelopment from the Japan Environment and Children's Study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia with Neonatal Umbilical Arterial Blood pH and Apgar Score: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).Yonago acta medica · 2026Article
- "Scientific trends of pharmacological methods in labor pain management: bibliometric analysis of epidural, spinal, and other approaches, 2000-2025".Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japan is one of the most developed countries in the world, and perinatal care is safe, with low maternal and neonatal mortality rates. However, as birthrate declines, advanced maternal age and the number of cesarean deliveries increases, efforts must be made to maintain safety in the future. The characteristic of the delivery facilities is "many small clinics," and half of all facilities have fewer than 500 deliveries per year. Such clinics rarely have full-time anesthesiologists; therefore, anesthetic management, including cesarean deliveries and labor analgesia, is left to obstetricians' efforts. Furthermore, the prevalence of labor analgesia is very low compared with that in developed countries. In 2017, maternal deaths during labor analgesia were reported and became a social problem. The Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) appointed a research group to conduct a study on labor analgesia and issued recommendations for a safe delivery system in 2018. Even when recommendations are understood, changing the size and staffing of medical facilities is challenging, and the field needs specific interventions such as education and information sharing. Most maternal deaths related to anesthesia are preventable. Within the existing medical environment, a distinctive anesthetic management system is crucial to improve the safety of perinatal care, and cooperation among obstetricians, anesthesiologists, nurses, and midwives involved in perinatal care through education and management is essential. We review past perinatal safety initiatives in Japan and discuss the need to make obstetric anesthesia safer as future risks increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.