ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Validity and Reliability of the Hungarian Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Among Women with Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement Properties of the Arabic Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Individuals with Neck Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychological, Symptom-Related, and Lifestyle Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Hungarian Women with Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our study aimed to perform Hungarian cross-cultural adaptation and assess the reliability and validity of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) in women diagnosed with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Methods: The current study was conducted in Hungary among women aged 18-50 (34.39 ± 6.68 years). We examined the reliability of the Hungarian version of PSEQ (PSEQ-HU) by applying internal consistency and test-retest evaluations. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the construct validity of the PSEQ-HU, while Spearman's rank correlation coefficient established the convergent validity using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Perceived Stress Scale. To determine discriminant validity, two groups were created based on NRS (0-4 no or mild pain, 5-10 moderate or strong pain). The results were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 28.0 software with a significance level of Results: A total of 262 women participated in this study. The Cronbach's α was 0.97, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values showed adequate reliability (ICC = 0.94. 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.97) for the PSEQ-HU. Based on the Spearman's correlation coefficients the convergent validity showed significant results ( Conclusion: We concluded that the PSEQ is a reliable and valid measurement among Hungarian women with endometriosis-related pelvic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.