Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Gaining stakeholder perspectives to shape a produce prescription program to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a qualitative study.

Helene Vilme, Fang Fang Zhang, Perrie O'Tierney-Ginn, Chenchen H Sun, Oyedolapo A Anyanwu, Rukhshan Fahmi, Sara C Folta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helene VilmeFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Fang Fang ZhangFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Perrie O'Tierney-GinnFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Chenchen H SunSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Oyedolapo A AnyanwuFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Rukhshan FahmiFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Sara C FoltaFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nutrition during pregnancy significantly impacts maternal and birth outcomes. A key factor contributing to the rise in adverse maternal and birth outcomes is poor nutrition. Produce prescription programs have the potential to address pregnancy-related adverse outcomes such as hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes, but scientific evidence is limited. Purpose: To conduct qualitative interviews to gain an in-depth understanding of how, why, and in what context should produce prescriptions be implemented to best meet the needs of pregnant women in a clinical setting. Methods: We conducted interviews with 11 patients with low incomes and/or experiencing food insecurity and 11 clinic staff from a major metropolitan OB/GYN clinic. Interview questions were designed to understand attitudes toward participating in or helping implement a produce prescription program. We analyzed the data using a deductive qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Both patients and clinic staff perceived many benefits to this type of program, including easing financial strain, removing barriers to access, and addressing nutrition security during pregnancy. Both groups described a need to consider participants' autonomy in the program design. Patients also perceived some drawbacks to the home delivery aspect, such as limited participation by patients due to unstable housing. Staff expressed some concerns about the staff time needed to implement this type of program. Conclusion: There was strong support for produce prescription programs for this population; however, results indicate that they may best meet needs if patient autonomy and delivery-related barriers are considered in the design. Designating screening and enrollment tasks for ancillary staff may facilitate implementation in clinics.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultFemaleFood InsecurityHumansInterviews as TopicPovertyPregnancyQualitative Researchfood insecurityfood is medicinematernal healthnutritionproduce prescription

Identifiers

PMID39882113
PMCPMC11774915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.