ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Gaining stakeholder perspectives to shape a produce prescription program to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing patient and provider perspectives on a rural, multilevel, community-engaged Food is Medicine intervention.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Healthcare provider perceptions of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program: a qualitative study.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Exploring a food is medicine pilot program to improve dietary quality among rural perinatal patients.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Advancing Food Is Medicine Research: An EPIS-Informed Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Views.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nutrition during pregnancy significantly impacts maternal and birth outcomes. A key factor contributing to the rise in adverse maternal and birth outcomes is poor nutrition. Produce prescription programs have the potential to address pregnancy-related adverse outcomes such as hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes, but scientific evidence is limited. Purpose: To conduct qualitative interviews to gain an in-depth understanding of how, why, and in what context should produce prescriptions be implemented to best meet the needs of pregnant women in a clinical setting. Methods: We conducted interviews with 11 patients with low incomes and/or experiencing food insecurity and 11 clinic staff from a major metropolitan OB/GYN clinic. Interview questions were designed to understand attitudes toward participating in or helping implement a produce prescription program. We analyzed the data using a deductive qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Both patients and clinic staff perceived many benefits to this type of program, including easing financial strain, removing barriers to access, and addressing nutrition security during pregnancy. Both groups described a need to consider participants' autonomy in the program design. Patients also perceived some drawbacks to the home delivery aspect, such as limited participation by patients due to unstable housing. Staff expressed some concerns about the staff time needed to implement this type of program. Conclusion: There was strong support for produce prescription programs for this population; however, results indicate that they may best meet needs if patient autonomy and delivery-related barriers are considered in the design. Designating screening and enrollment tasks for ancillary staff may facilitate implementation in clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.