ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Genomics costing tool: considerations for improving cost-efficiencies through cross scenario comparison.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating genomic data into healthcare practice with the Singapore National Precision Medicine program.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- How Pandemics Have Reshaped the Respiratory Virus Data Landscape in Europe: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Harnessing genomic and bioinformatics for surveillance of pathogens in Africa: a scoping review of existing training and gaps in training.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics capacity: findings from a multi-country survey to guide the genomics costing tool 2.0.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Optimization of nanopore sequencing for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Connecting biospecimens and data: a scoping review-informed conceptual framework for digital infrastructure in biobanking and genomic research in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Applications of Genome Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: From Pathogen Identification to Precision Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Panels to Pathogen Networks: The Expanding Role of Targeted Sequencing in Veterinary Medicine.Biology · 2025Review
- Current Progress and Future Trends of Genomics-Based Techniques for Food Adulteration Identification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long-Read Sequencing for the Rapid Response to Infectious Diseases Outbreaks.Current clinical microbiology reports · 2025Review
- Next generation sequencing as a panacea for antibiotic susceptibility testing: yea or nay?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is crucial for monitoring and investigating infectious disease outbreaks, providing essential data for public health decisions. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly expanded pathogen sequencing and bioinformatics capacities worldwide, creating an opportunity to leverage these advancements for other pathogens with pandemic and epidemic potential. In response to the need for a systematic cost estimation approach for sustainable genomic surveillance, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, five institutions collaborated to develop the genomics costing tool (GCT). These institutions are the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), FIND, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), and the World Health Organization (WHO). To validate the GCT, it was piloted in public health laboratories across three WHO regions: African, Eastern Mediterranean, and European. The pilot exercises were intended to assess the tool's accuracy, utility, and functionality, exploring scenarios for validating past expenditure, routine use, cost optimization, and scaling up sequencing services. Data from these pilots demonstrated significant cost reductions per sample with increased throughput, underscoring the economic benefits of the optimized use of sequencing platforms underpinned by sample throughput. The GCT enables laboratories to estimate and visualize costs, plan budgets, and improve cost-efficiencies for sequencing and bioinformatics based on factors such as equipment purchase and preventative maintenance, reagents and consumables, annual sample throughput, human resources training, quality assurance and management. This publication shares key findings from pilot exercises offering detailed insights into the cost of routine NGS implementation using either short- or long-read sequencing technologies, demonstrating the utility of GCT as an asset to support efforts for sustainable funding and strategic planning in genomic surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.