ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024
Comparison of clinical efficacy of different internal fixation methods in older adult patients with osteoporotic fractures of proximal humerus.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of three treatment methods for older adult patients with osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures: proximal humerus locking plate (PHILOS) combined with calcium sulfate injection, PHILOS plate alone, and artificial hemi-shoulder joint replacement. Methods: The clinical data of 48 older adult patients with osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures admitted to the Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Department of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated with Dalian University from February 2018-August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients comprised 18 males and 30 females, with a mean age of (68.6 ± 5.8) years. The 48 patients were divided into three groups based on their treatment methods: Group A: 16 patients treated with PHILOS plate combined with calcium sulfate injection. Group B: 16 patients treated with the PHILOS plate alone. Group C: 16 patients treated with artificial hemi-shoulder joint replacement. Key parameters such as operation time, blood loss, incision length, operation cost, and shoulder joint motion at the final follow-up were recorded and compared. Shoulder joint function was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, University of California Shoulder Joint Score (UCLA), and Brief Shoulder Function Test (SST). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative general data between the three groups ( Conclusion: All three surgical methods are effective in treating older adult osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures, as they significantly alleviate pain and restore joint function. However, the use of a PHILOS plate combined with calcium sulfate injection (Group A) is particularly effective, demonstrating reliable clinical efficacy with fewer complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.