Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882045›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

The Clinical Impression of NDM-producing

Sangeeta Singh, Anuragani Verma, Vimala Venkatesh, Sheetal Verma, D Himanshu Reddy, Avinash Agrawal

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Evidence-based Recommendations for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistantIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sangeeta SinghDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4655-6967
Anuragani VermaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-0565
Vimala VenkateshDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-4248
Sheetal VermaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-4850
D Himanshu ReddyDepartment of Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5627-4412
Avinash AgrawalDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-4166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and background: Carbapenem-resistant Materials and methods: In ICU patients, 69 Results: Out of 66 Conclusion: NDM-positive Clinical significance: NDM-positive How to cite this article: Singh S, Verma A, Venkatesh V, Verma S, Reddy DH, Agrawal A. The Clinical Impression of NDM-producing

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceBloodstream infectionCarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiIntensive care unitNew Delhi metallo-β-lactamases

Identifiers

PMID39882045
PMCPMC11773585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.