ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Evaluation of
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to analyze the safety and effectiveness of the ProBC Plus ( Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial study was conducted involving 50 subjects diagnosed with ailments related to immune system dysfunction and stress related disorders. Patients were treated with ProBC Plus (2 billion colony-forming units [CFU]) along with a placebo capsule administered once daily for a period of 8 weeks. Results: The effects of ProBC Plus exhibited a positive response on stress relief, lipid parameters, immune status, and vital signs, which is further statistically significant ( Conclusion: The study on ProBC Plus showed positive results. Over the course of 8 weeks, an improvement in the immune status was observed, as indicated by the immune status questionnaire. Enzymatic markers exhibited a significant decline in predicting a positive response toward treatment. In terms of lipid profile, ProBC Plus helps to maintain the value within the normal range, thereby predicting its potential as cardiovascular support. The vital signs remained within the normal range throughout the study. Therefore, ProBC Plus is considered safe for consumption and contributes to the overall well-being of individuals. Clinical trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=77914&EncHid=24313.96864&userName=CTRI/2023/01/048720, CTRI/2023/01/048720.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.