Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39882002›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Alum sludge-driven electro-phytoremediation in constructed wetlands: a novel approach for sustainable nutrient removal.

Daryoush Sanaei, Amir Mirshafiee, Amir Adibzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daryoush SanaeiStudent Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran daryoushsanaei@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-3222
Amir MirshafieeHealth Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran a_mirsh1@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-6576
Amir AdibzadehHealth Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran a_mirsh1@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to their advantages as promising methods for wastewater treatment, CWs exhibit poor performance in terms of N and P removal efficiency in the effluent of wastewater treatment plants. By focusing on this issue, we designed CWs integrated with a biochar-doped activated carbon cloth (ACC) electrode and alum sludge from water treatment plants as a substrate to achieve concomitant organic matter and nutrient removal efficiency. Compared with the use of one layer of alum sludge in CWs (CWs-C3) with ACC electrodes inserted in two layers, which uses one layer of alum sludge, a significant improvement in removal efficiency was achieved (96% for COD; 89% for TN; and 77% for TP). The findings revealed that the application of potential accompanied by the insertion of a cathode ACC electrode into the first layer of alum sludge was beneficial for completing nitrification and facilitating denitrification in the cathode and anode regions, respectively, resulting in increased removal of organic matter and nutrients. Further evaluation revealed that the TN-TP synergetic removal mechanism was influenced by the use of Fe

Identifiers

PMID39882002
PMCPMC11775503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.