ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Evaluation of machine learning techniques for real-time prediction of implanted lower limb mechanics.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in knee osteotomy: evolution of alignment assessment and surgical decision-making.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Gait-to-Contact (G2C): A Novel Deep Learning Framework to Predict Total Knee Replacement Wear from Gait Patterns.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Design and Testing of an Emg-Controlled Semi-Active Knee Prosthesis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate prediction of knee biomechanics during total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is crucial for optimal outcomes. This study investigates the application of machine learning (ML) techniques for real-time prediction of knee joint mechanics. Methods: A validated finite element (FE) model of the lower limb was used to generate a dataset of knee joint kinematics, kinetics, and contact mechanics. The models were trained on joint alignment data, ligament information, and external boundary conditions. Several predictive algorithms were explored, including linear regression (LRM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), bi-directional long short-term memory (biLSTM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and transformer-based approaches. The performance of these models was evaluated using average normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE). Results: The biLSTM model achieved the highest accuracy, with a significantly lower nRMSE compared to other models. Compared to traditional FE or rigid body dynamics models, these predictive models offered significantly faster prediction speeds, enabling near-instantaneous insights into the TKR system's performance. The small size of the predictive models makes them suitable for deployment on edge devices potentially used in operating rooms. Discussion: These findings suggest that real-time biomechanical prediction using biLSTM models has the potential to provide valuable feedback for surgeons during TKR surgery. Applications of this work could be applied to provide pre-operative guidance on optimal target implant alignment or given the real-time prediction ability of these models, could also be used intra-operatively after integration of patient-specific intra-op kinematic and soft-tissue information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.