ArticleCureus2024
Percutaneous Pinning for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Insights From a Five-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of proximal humerus fractures: a review of contemporary treatment options.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProximal humerus fractures are a common orthopedic challenge, particularly in older adults. Percutaneous pinning, a minimally invasive technique, aims to stabilize fractures while preserving soft tissue integrity. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of patients treated with percutaneous pinning at a single center over five years.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fractures between 2018 and 2023. Of 15 identified patients, 13 met the inclusion criteria of completing at least a three-month follow-up. Data were extracted from clinical records and radiological assessments, focusing on demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, complications, and functional outcomes.
resultsThe study included 13 patients, of whom 12 (92%) were female, with a mean age of 60 years (range: 12-73 years). Most fractures (12/13, 92%) were three-part injuries resulting from low-energy trauma (11/13, 85%). All procedures were performed by a consultant shoulder specialist, using a combination of two to three K-wires with suture anchors. Anatomical alignment was achieved postoperatively in 10 (77%) cases, and radiological healing was observed in 10 (77%) by four weeks. At final follow-up, 12 (92%) patients demonstrated either excellent (9/13, 69%) or good alignment (3/13, 23%). Functionally, 11 (85%) patients reported either no pain (9/13, 69%) or mild pain (2/13, 15%). Similarly, 11 (85%) achieved either full functionality (8/13, 62%) or functionality with mild limitations (3/13, 23%) in arm use, with eight (62%) demonstrating a good range of motion. Complications were minimal, with no adverse events in nine (69%) cases. Early pin loosening occurred in three (23%) patients, and one (8%) required wire removal due to significant displacement. Follow-up duration ranged from three to 15 months (mean: 7.5 months), with patients attending an average of five clinic visits.
conclusionPercutaneous pinning provides reliable outcomes for selected proximal humerus fractures, yielding high rates of functional recovery and favorable radiological results. The use of suture anchors is particularly important for stabilizing the greater tuberosity and ensuring calcar support. With most patients experiencing satisfactory pain relief, functional use, and alignment, this minimally invasive approach demonstrates its efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.