Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881888›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Comparative main effects, mediators, and moderators of cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and emotional awareness and expression therapy for chronic spinal pain: Randomized controlled trial rationale and protocol.

John W Burns, Mark A Lumley, Kevin E Vowles, Mark P Jensen, Melissa A Day, Howard Schubiner, Emma Jaszczak, Britney Abro, Sarah H Addicks, Michael J Bordieri and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

John W BurnsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mark A LumleyDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast & Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa A DaySchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Howard SchubinerCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Emma JaszczakDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Britney AbroDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sarah H AddicksSchool of Health, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael J BordieriDepartment of Psychology, Murray State University, Murray, KY, USA.
Michael M DowPrivate Practice, Longmont, CO, USA.
Shoshana KrohnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Montefiore/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Zyanya MendozaZ Psychology Inc., Greater Los Angeles, California, USA.
Eric C MeyerDepartment of Counseling and Behavioral Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Danielle Z MiroPrivate Practice, Reno, NV, USA.
Hallie TankhaDepartment of Wellness and Preventive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David S TubmanPrivate Practice, Dayton, OH, USA.
Jolin B YaminBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Dokyoung S YouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Comparative Mechanisms (Mediators, Moderators) of Psychosocial Chronic Pain TreatmentsR01NR020610 · NINR · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John W. Burns, MARK A LUMLEY · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR020610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic spinal (back/neck) pain is common and costly. Psychosocial treatments are available but have modest effects. Knowledge of treatment mechanisms (mediators and moderators) can be used to enhance efficacy. Trials that directly compare different treatments are needed to determine which mechanisms are treatment-specific, which are shared across treatments, and which contribute the most to outcomes. Methods: We will conduct a 4-arm randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the main effects, mediators, and moderators of three pain therapies: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy in adults with chronic spinal pain. Following baseline assessment of outcomes variables (two primary outcomes: pain intensity and pain interference) and potential mediators and moderators, we will randomize participants (up to 460) to one of the treatments or usual care control. Treatments will be conducted individually each week for 8 weeks via telehealth. We will conduct weekly assessments of both potential mediators and outcomes, as well as post-treatment and 6-month follow-up assessments. We will test whether any of the therapies is superior to the others (Aim 1); identify mediators that are specific to treatments and those that are shared across treatments (Aim 2); and identify baseline moderators that are specific to treatments or shared across treatments, and moderated mediators of treatments (Aim 3). Discussion: The findings from this project can be used to improve the effects of psychosocial chronic pain treatments by identifying the most powerful specific and shared mechanisms and revealing for whom the mediator-outcome pathways are strongest.

Indexed as

Chronic painMechanismMediatorModeratorPsychological therapy

Identifiers

PMID39881888
PMCPMC11773268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.