ArticleAllergologie select2025
Significant handling errors and education gaps regarding the use of the emergency kit among adult patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy.
Article in Allergologie select, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adrenaline nasal spray in emergency management: An initial expert opinion.Allergologie select · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimIn case of systemic anaphylactic reactions after Hymenoptera stings, patients should be provided with an adrenaline autoinjector (AAI). We aimed to evaluate the education and handling competence of patients in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with Hymenoptera venom allergy presenting for the first time in our clinic with a previously prescribed emergency kit including an AAI were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire and were asked to demonstrate the AAI use with a dummy.
results82 patients (62.2% female, mean age 52.0 ± 17.3 years) with allergy to wasp venom (85.3%), bee venom (9.8%), or hornet venom (4.9%) were included. 37.8% reported to have received a practical training on the AAI upon prescription. 59.8% of all patients showed significant handling errors which would have led to misinjections in 30.6%.
conclusionOur data demonstrate a considerable lack of education, significant handling errors of the emergency kit, and a high risk of misinjections of the AAI. As the emergency kit is potentially lifesaving, the awareness for a sufficient education and training needs to be risen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.