ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2025
Identification of clinical subgroups in anti-SRP positive immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy patients using cluster analysis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anti-signal recognition particle immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (anti-SRP IMNM) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness and necrosis. Identifying clinical subgroups within this patient population could facilitate the management of the disease. Objectives: To identify distinct clinical subgroups of anti-SRP IMNM patients. Design: A retrospective study was conducted on anti-SRP IMNM patients treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2010 and October 2023. Methods: Clinical data were collected. Unsupervised cluster analysis was conducted to classify patients into distinct subgroups based on their clinical features. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes among the identified clusters. Results: A total of 116 patients were included in the study, and 3 distinct clinical subgroups were identified: Cluster 3 (acute), Cluster 2 (subacute), and Cluster 1 (poor prognosis). Patients in Cluster 3 exhibited a short disease course (median 3 months), severe muscle weakness (78.38% with Medical Research Council (MRC) score ⩽3), high muscle enzyme levels, and a good response to treatment. Cluster 2 patients were younger (mean age 45.83 years), had a longer disease course (median 6.5 months), milder muscle damage, and lower autoantibody titers. Cluster 1 patients were older (mean age 58.10 years), predominantly male (70.97%), and had higher incidences of interstitial lung disease (70.97%) and cardiac injury (45.16%). In Cluster 1, 16.13% of cases were refractory, and the relapse rate was 38.71%, which was significantly higher compared to the other two clusters. Conclusion: This study highlights the clinical heterogeneity among anti-SRP IMNM patients and identifies three distinct clinical subgroups with unique characteristics. These findings provide insights for personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.