Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881790›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Analysis of over 1600 chemistry YouTube channels from 2005 to 2023.

Scott Gardner, Gabriela Bezati, Tristen Godfrey, Katie Baird, Usamah Bilal, Emma Loudon, Rhona Young, Lewis E MacKenzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott Gardner *Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Gabriela Bezati *Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Tristen Godfrey *Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Katie BairdDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Usamah BilalDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Emma LoudonDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Rhona YoungDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.
Lewis E MacKenzie *Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland G1 1RD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-0525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemistry has found broad appeal on the freely available global video-sharing platform YouTube, with some YouTube videos even being cited in the peer-reviewed chemistry literature. By applying both manual and semi-automated search methods, we identified, categorized and analysed publicly available data for 1619 chemistry YouTube channels that were available in 2023. Forty-nine per cent of channels were active in 12 months prior to sampling. The majority of channels were produced by independent content creators with no clear affiliation or background and 71% of channels were for the purposes of learning or exam revision. YouTube video production spiked in 2020, coincident with the COVID-19 global pandemic. We also examined the number of videos produced, channel lifespans, the use of features such as playlists and short-form videos, apparent revenue streams (outside of default advertising), the use of other social media and whether or not channels were exclusively producing chemistry content. This study and the associated dataset provide the first large-scale 'census' of how YouTube is being used for chemistry communication and education worldwide. We expect our findings to be of interest and use to policy makers, funding agencies, educators, content creators and the public.

Indexed as

chemistryemerging medianew mediaquantitative analysisscience communicationyoutube

Identifiers

PMID39881790
PMCPMC11774589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.