ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Outcome of
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that do not respond to standard therapies are commonly considered for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT). The benefit of Methods: Forty-one patients with refractory, progressive, or advanced symptomatic NETs, with or without previous treatment modalities were studied. They were treated with Results: The mean serum Chromogranin A level at baseline was 2841 U/ml (Median = 3150). The main site of primary NET was in the pancreas, and the most common site for metastases was the liver. Following PRRT, all patients, except one, reported an improvement in their baseline complaints. Most (82%) reported no new symptoms, and 50% had a reduction in serum Chromogranin A levels. Follow-up imaging showed regression in one patient, static tumor in 18, and progression in rest. Considering radiological and clinical responses, the overall benefit was noticed in 29 (70%) patients. Despite symptomatic improvement, there was no significant survival benefit for those with pancreatic, liver, or nodal metastasis. Conclusion: A majority of patients who were treated with PRRT demonstrated clinical, radiological as well as biochemical positive responses warranting an earlier consideration for this well-tolerated treatment modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.